TL;DR
Get backup power and energy gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Utility Dive sponsored report argues that North America can ease near-term electricity constraints by making better use of existing grid infrastructure alongside building new capacity. It cites demand forecasts, interconnection queues and examples of planning and congestion measures, though the claimed savings and broader impact depend on estimates and implementation.
A Utility Dive sponsored report says utilities and grid operators could address some near-term electricity pressures by getting more use from existing transmission assets, while continuing to build new infrastructure. It points to rising demand, crowded interconnection queues and recent planning and congestion initiatives as reasons to pursue both approaches in parallel.
The report cites a North American demand outlook in which data centers, industrial electrification, electric vehicles, manufacturing and population growth add pressure to the grid. It references a North American Electric Reliability Corp. forecast that U.S. electricity consumption could rise from 4,281 TWh in 2024 to 5,353 TWh by 2034. That is a forecast, not a measured outcome, and the report says other studies project still higher growth.
It also reports that more than 2 TW of U.S. generation and storage capacity was in interconnection queues by mid-2026. In Texas, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas received nearly 200 GW of large-load applications in the first quarter of 2026, according to the report. Queue capacity and applications represent proposed connections and requests; they do not mean that all of the capacity will be built or that all proposed loads will proceed.
The report describes tools including advanced asset monitoring, integrated operational data, dynamic line ratings and advanced power-flow controls. It cites Southwest Power Pool’s reported 30% reduction in transmission planning time after modernizing planning processes and using advanced analytics. It also says the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved an SPP topology optimization plan in August 2026, following MISO efforts that reportedly saved about $95 million in congestion costs earlier in the year. The report does not provide the underlying calculation details for those figures.
How Optimization Could Ease Grid Pressure
Making better use of existing equipment could give operators more room to manage demand while new generation, transmission lines and substations are planned and built. That matters because infrastructure projects take time, while some large-load requests and demand increases are happening now. Better information about equipment condition and network constraints can also help utilities target maintenance and investment where they are most useful.
The report cites a separate analysis estimating that better use of U.S. power infrastructure could save more than $100 billion over the next decade. That is a modeled estimate, not a guaranteed reduction in consumer bills. The report does not explain how much of the projected savings would come from particular technologies, which regions would benefit, or how costs and savings would be shared.
Optimization cannot substitute for all new construction. The report itself says projected demand requires continued expansion and modernization of transmission and distribution networks. Its central case is for optimization alongside investment, with operational changes potentially improving near-term flexibility as longer-term projects advance.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Demand Forecasts and Grid Initiatives
The report frames the issue as a gap between anticipated electricity needs and the pace at which grid infrastructure can be expanded. It says conservative operating assumptions, network bottlenecks and fragmented data may leave some existing capacity difficult to identify or use. Those are the report’s explanations; it does not quantify how much spare capacity is available across North America or in any specific region.
Its examples span planning, operations and transmission control. Southwest Power Pool’s reported planning-time reduction concerns the time needed to complete studies, while topology optimization changes how the network is configured to manage flows and congestion. These initiatives can improve use of the existing system, but their results do not by themselves establish how much additional load a grid can reliably serve.
The source is a sponsored Utility Dive article promoting a Hitachi Energy white paper. Its estimates and examples should be read in that context. The cited NERC forecast, interconnection queue data and operator announcements provide points of reference, but the article does not present a comprehensive independent assessment of optimization potential across the continent.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How Much Capacity Can Be Added
The report does not quantify the amount of additional power that optimization could make available across North America, or specify where that capacity could be accessed. It also does not detail the assumptions behind the $100 billion savings estimate or the reported MISO congestion-cost savings. Those figures should not be treated as directly comparable measures.
Interconnection queue totals and large-load applications can change as projects advance, are revised or are withdrawn. The source does not say how many queued projects will connect, how much capacity they will deliver, or when it will become available. Nor does it establish whether results from SPP or MISO initiatives will transfer to other grid regions.
grid monitoring and control systems
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Implementation and New Construction
Utilities and grid operators will need to assess equipment condition, operating limits and network constraints to determine where monitoring, controls or planning changes can help. The report gives no timetable for broader deployment or specific targets for capacity gains. The next evidence to watch is whether operators publish measured results, including costs, reliability effects and congestion changes.
Meanwhile, new generation, storage and transmission projects must move through planning, permitting, interconnection and construction. The report presents optimization as a way to improve current operations during that process, while acknowledging that long-term grid expansion remains necessary.
portable solar panel for power stations
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What does “hidden capacity” mean in the report?
It refers to potential additional use of grid assets already in service, through measures such as better monitoring, planning and management of power flows. The report does not quantify the total capacity available.
Does grid optimization remove the need for new transmission?
No. The report says demand growth requires continued expansion and modernization of transmission and distribution networks. It presents optimization as a complementary near-term measure.
Are the more than 2 TW in U.S. interconnection queues operating capacity?
No. The figure describes generation and storage capacity waiting in interconnection queues by mid-2026, according to the report. It does not mean those projects have been built or connected.
Are the projected savings guaranteed?
No. The report cites an analysis estimating more than $100 billion in U.S. savings over a decade from better grid utilization. It does not provide enough detail to treat that modeled estimate as a guaranteed consumer saving.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
